I noticed that too, but it appears to be normal under the Error 403 display.
Moderators: 2020k, Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
HappyCyclist wrote:Fredd-E wrote:babylulu wrote:Cosecha is back to a 403 error for me
That escalated quickly.
I noticed it went from HTTP 522 -> HTTP 403 -> Failed to connect to web server -> Error 900 -> HTTP 403.
All this in the last 8 hours.
Any web-heads out there know what this means?
magrathea_ultima wrote:Someone is fucking around with the server(s) in a rather amateurish way, you are not supposed to expose a live server with such dysfunctional configuration.I doubt it is trolling. "Never attribute to malice (or intent) that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Davism wrote:It would take a special kind of sociopath to troll BoC fans without making more of a spectacle on the site. If it were a troll, they'd be signaling sort sort of inside joke or something to take the piss out of us.
Chodlington wrote:After such a complex and nuanced release campaign for TH, I refuse to believe someone messing about on the backend of a 12 year old website has anything to do with a new album. If these changes followed some kind of pattern, or offered any kind of breadcrumb I might get excited. But they don’t.
Fredd-E wrote:Who says it has to do with a new album? We speculate this maybe has to do with BoC in general.
Messing about on the backend? But it's also frontend changes all of us witness. Don't tell me "nobody home..." _with_ morsecode was a mere accident, a simple byproduct of some Warp intern tinkering? That at least had to be on purpose. What purpose? I don't know.
Another thing the obvious visibility of a login form for 3 whole days. Clearly they could've put that online somewhere else than the root of the website where all of us, again, could see it.
It's like you said, Warp is not incompetent. Hence what we're seeing has some sort of meaning otherwise they would've shut it down and hired some other development agency.
It's been going on for too many months to call it some accidental human error.
Fredd-E wrote:Chodlington wrote:After such a complex and nuanced release campaign for TH, I refuse to believe someone messing about on the backend of a 12 year old website has anything to do with a new album. If these changes followed some kind of pattern, or offered any kind of breadcrumb I might get excited. But they don’t.
Who says it has to do with a new album?
Cyclosa wrote:Just face it, their fanbase is just not that important to them. No interviews, no tours, no new music, no communication whatsoever in over 10 years.
People on here get so hung up on their parasocial relationship with BOC that every little blip of data on their website or socials must imply a direct message to their fans. It’s not. They really do not care about us.
Aren’t you guys tired of the constant dichotomy between “every blip is a masterful move & coded message” and “they don’t care about me and are gone forever”?
Mea culpa, sorry, you're right, the whole discussion about cosecha-transmisiones.com should be held in multiple separate topics. One for people thinking it's related to a new album, another one for those who think it's more loosely connected to BoC. Why not a third topic where doomers can discuss it because they believe it has nothing to do with BoC at all? A bit silly, don't you think?Cyclosa wrote:Love this. Then why are you bringing all this stuff up in the speculation thread about the new album?
Just face it, their fanbase is just not that important to them. No interviews, no tours, no new music, no communication whatsoever in over 10 years.
People on here get so hung up on their parasocial relationship with BOC that every little blip of data on their website or socials must imply a direct messa ge to their fans. It’s not. They very obviously do not care.
Perhaps because you don't want to see it?Cyclosa wrote:doesn’t mean you can’t incidentally share information about (the lack of) upcoming projects or gigs. But even that is not happening.
They don't care indeed and that's why BoC (via MDG) got Twoism involved in 2013 TH ARG and again in 2022 with MDG's message to Babylulu. I genuinely believe they do appreciate their loyal positive fans.Cyclosa wrote:I’m not bitter, i wish nothing but good things on them, but i genuinely believe they’re not thinking of us here at Twoism at all.
Fredd-E wrote:Perhaps because you don't want to see it?Cyclosa wrote:doesn’t mean you can’t incidentally share information about (the lack of) upcoming projects or gigs. But even that is not happening.
- Indirect: MDG, their spokesperson, informed us in summer 2022 a new album is on its way
- Direct: their official IG acknowledged 38! comments all revolving around the topic of new music
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests