Corbyn

Random chat: movies, books, games, technology, etcetera.

Moderators: Mexicola, 2020k, Fredd-E, Aesthetics

User avatar
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 8216
Joined: 30 May 2007
Location: Dorset, UK
Green Party member here, living in North Dorset.
Tory MP here every year since 1960-something.
Currently a huge Tory majority, with Simon Hoare (the wettest of Tory arseholes) enjoying something like 65% of the local vote.
Doesn't matter one jot who I vote for - Green, Labour, even LibDem.
I shall still vote, on principle and in hope.

If YOU have the slightest chance of voting out a Tory, PLEASE do not go spoiling your ballot paper.
When hope dies, 'they' have won.
Image

Slow down...

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 2100
Joined: 7 Feb 2014
Location: London, UK
There is quite a significant difference between spoiling a ballot and not voting.

It isn't just that there isn't a party aligned with my views, there isn't a party appearing on my ballot that I am not fundamentally opposed to to at least a notable extent. I will go to the polling station and exercise my rights, spoiled ballots are counted. People who don't go to vote are seen as an example of low turnout and not of apathy, but of people that can be convinced to vote one way or another or who otherwise aren't interested in politics.

There is nothing about modern society and the services that government provide that I view as set in stone and that I know couldn't be taken away. I take none of it for granted, but the choice is between two ways of decline. Good intentions on the part of Corbyn aren't going to change the fact that his policies will inevitably be as damaging as the Tories are. I really do like him.

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 1046
Joined: 21 May 2013
If there's no party that you don't have a fundamental problem with, then I don't really understand what point spoiling your ballot makes.
Why do you think Labour's policies will be as damaging as the Tories?
The Labour manifesto actually isn't radical enough for me, but it is moving in the right direction. That's about as much as I can expect from a political party.

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 2100
Joined: 7 Feb 2014
Location: London, UK
I understand where you are coming from. Primarily because a spoiled ballot isn't a sign of someone who is too apathetic or disinterested to vote. It is a record of someone who made the effort to register, go to the polling station and fill out a ballot. Spoiled ballots are tallied up and they say quite a lot.

The problem we face with the tories is of course the death of a thousand cuts. I am unemployed and technically disabled, so essentially and on a personal level, what I am being told is that people like me should disappear and die. That is awful.

Corbyn's agenda for industry is fantastic, a society in which it is near impossible to be homeless or go hungry is wonderful. Unfortunately, this can only work for the existing populace. It will become a beacon to those seeking to come from overseas to exploit said system, these people exist and they exist in higher numbers than our country could ever deal with, they also give those who are genuinely seeking refuge or the chance to work a bad name by association. Socialism combined with relaxed policies on borders will spell the end of the dream. Money that exists for the disabled and those between jobs or who are struggling to find work will be gradually siphoned away until there is a system by which those that work are essentially the slaves of those who have come into the country for a free ride on the taxes of people they have no kinship with. Barely any of those Syrian "refugees" were ethnically Syrian, on camera constantly talking about how when they get to the UK or Germany (surely those fleeing a war would go to the first point of safety rather than crossing countless countries with no war to get to the one that suits them) that they will be "in the money" and not have to work again. Meanwhile a family from India who come here wanting to work for our NHS have a difficult time. If the borders become any more relaxed, those who want nothing other than to never have to work and feel no guilt at doing so at the expense of others, citing some distant history of colonization from the 1800s as their justification of the hatred of their hosts, will arrive in abundance to bask in our new benefits system set up to help those who live here from becoming homeless or dead, or to help those fleeing war and torture. Not those abroad who already had enough money to pay off the traffickers who pay off the owners of the NGO "rescue" ships (most of which are ferries and deal directly with traffickers) The entire world can't thrive off the backs of Britain's working class.

I know that if you are a socialist, and entrenched in what people try to say that socialism should be, you will already have heard a lot of this and be made to feel a certain sense of anger. I understand that. I don't say this as a trope or with a hidden agenda and I don't say anything that I can't back up with hard data should you wish to ask for it. I haven't a problem with those who seek to come here to be upstanding members of society, who like our culture and who want to work.

Allowing people who exist in the millions, who have been schooled on what to say to game the system and who will do nothing but drain money from a country and people they hate will destroy even Corbyn's future economy. There is no way around it.

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 1046
Joined: 21 May 2013
You've said this -

Valotonin wrote:Corbyn's agenda for industry is fantastic, a society in which it is near impossible to be homeless or go hungry is wonderful. Unfortunately, this can only work for the existing populace. It will become a beacon to those seeking to come from overseas to exploit said system, these people exist and they exist in higher numbers than our country could ever deal with, they also give those who are genuinely seeking refuge or the chance to work a bad name by association. Socialism combined with relaxed policies on borders will spell the end of the dream. Money that exists for the disabled and those between jobs or who are struggling to find work will be gradually siphoned away until there is a system by which those that work are essentially the slaves of those who have come into the country for a free ride on the taxes of people they have no kinship with. Barely any of those Syrian "refugees" were ethnically Syrian, on camera constantly talking about how when they get to the UK or Germany (surely those fleeing a war would go to the first point of safety rather than crossing countless countries with no war to get to the one that suits them) that they will be "in the money" and not have to work again.


But we can't predict the future, so I can't help but feel, given below from
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/insights/migration-statistics-how-many-asylum-seekers-and-refugees-are-there-in-the-uk/ that you are hugely overstating your case.

Are Syrians counted as asylum seekers?
Syrian refugees are a special case within the statistics. Although many have applied for asylum through the UK’s in-country asylum process (919 in 2018), the majority of Syrian refugees in the UK have been resettled directly from abroad: specifically, from the countries surrounding Syria to which they had been displaced by the conflict.

From 2014 onwards, the UK began resettling Syrians under the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS), with the aim of resettling 20,000 by 2020. The current number resettled in the UK is around 15,000.

Resettlement is a different process to asylum-seeking
Resettled people are granted refugee status or another form of humanitarian protection by the UK while abroad and then brought to live in the UK.

While in refugee camps, people’s refugee status is determined by officials from UNHCR and the UK Government then selects who will be offered resettlement in the UK.

Given the scale of the VPRS (and other resettlement schemes in place), resettled people made up just over one quarter (27%) of those granted asylum in the UK over the last five years (2014-2018).

How have application levels changed over time?
In 2018, at least 20,000 people were granted asylum in the UK, including resettled people. This is around half the number granted in 2001 – at least 48,000 –the year with the most grants in recent decades.

‘Asylum’ is used here in a broad sense and includes those granted refugee status, humanitarian protection, and discretionary leave to remain on humanitarian grounds.

The present number is boosted by around 5,000 per year under resettlement programmes, the largest among them via VPRS.

A lack of official data over time means there are conflicting accounts of the total number of people granted asylum in the UK prior to the 1980s. Various estimates suggest that the periods with the most asylum grants were when:

Around 80,000 Jewish refugees came to the UK between 1933 and 1939, equivalent to around 11,000 per year.
Around 27,000 Asian Ugandans were resettled to the UK in 1972 and 1073, or 13,500 per year.
Between 17,000 and 22,500 Vietnamese refugees were resettled to the UK between 1979 and 1992, or around 1,400 per year.
For context, although these numbers are not directly comparable to those above, an average of around 15,000 people have been granted asylum in the UK per year, over the last five years. This includes an average of around 4,300 Syrians per year.



Meanwhile a family from India who come here wanting to work for our NHS have a difficult time.


But how is this statement consistent with the borders being 'relaxed', which you claim in your next sentence?

User avatar
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 8216
Joined: 30 May 2007
Location: Dorset, UK
Tell you what. I'll delete the posts for you, in exchange for you giving your head a shake, getting off your arse, holding your nose and voting on the 12th! Do we have a deal? ;-)
Image

Slow down...

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 2100
Joined: 7 Feb 2014
Location: London, UK
We certainly have a deal. There isn't much of a chance of displacing the Tories in this seat, but I will put my vote in regardless.

User avatar
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 8216
Joined: 30 May 2007
Location: Dorset, UK
Keep my side of the deal! :-)
Image

Slow down...

User avatar
Dayvan Cowboy
Status: Offline
Posts: 2100
Joined: 7 Feb 2014
Location: London, UK
Aye I will. As it goes, the damage Boris and his henchmen are doing to this country is enough to motivate me, really. That is real and provable damage rather than some distant speculation as well.

Previous

Return to The Playground

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests