Moderators: mdg, Mexicola, 2020k, Fredd-E, Aesthetics
corwood wrote:Magrathea wrote:corwood wrote:i am still not positive about hearing any 6 in the beginning of the code
not in the first recording and not in any other to be honest
the code is the NPR code but i hear a 2 in the beginning not a six at all.
gallery at number six is the name of last's night location
what if we received 299742 as the sixth number which is at position 1 as hinted?
just trying to make sense out of this.
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188469#188469
i know, i read this before.
still i can't hear the six in any recording. do you?
corwood wrote:Magrathea wrote:corwood wrote:i am still not positive about hearing any 6 in the beginning of the code
not in the first recording and not in any other to be honest
the code is the NPR code but i hear a 2 in the beginning not a six at all.
gallery at number six is the name of last's night location
what if we received 299742 as the sixth number which is at position 1 as hinted?
just trying to make sense out of this.
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188469#188469
i know, i read this before.
still i can't hear the six in any recording.
it can't be a coincidence that the location's name is gallery at number six.
they planned this carefully and with foresight.
North by North wrote:corwood wrote:Magrathea wrote:corwood wrote:i am still not positive about hearing any 6 in the beginning of the code
not in the first recording and not in any other to be honest
the code is the NPR code but i hear a 2 in the beginning not a six at all.
gallery at number six is the name of last's night location
what if we received 299742 as the sixth number which is at position 1 as hinted?
just trying to make sense out of this.
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188469#188469
i know, i read this before.
still i can't hear the six in any recording. do you?
Agree- a 2 can be possibly be heard. Who knows. Well, apparently others do...
corwood wrote:North by North wrote:corwood wrote:Magrathea wrote:corwood wrote:i am still not positive about hearing any 6 in the beginning of the code
not in the first recording and not in any other to be honest
the code is the NPR code but i hear a 2 in the beginning not a six at all.
gallery at number six is the name of last's night location
what if we received 299742 as the sixth number which is at position 1 as hinted?
just trying to make sense out of this.
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188469#188469
i know, i read this before.
still i can't hear the six in any recording. do you?
Agree- a 2 can be possibly be heard. Who knows. Well, apparently others do...
my impression is that everyone thinks it should be 6 because the NPR code is the nearest thing to think of. the other recordings didn't clear up anything for me, it was as muffled as anything else...
drSoul91 wrote:corwood wrote:Magrathea wrote:corwood wrote:i am still not positive about hearing any 6 in the beginning of the code
not in the first recording and not in any other to be honest
the code is the NPR code but i hear a 2 in the beginning not a six at all.
gallery at number six is the name of last's night location
what if we received 299742 as the sixth number which is at position 1 as hinted?
just trying to make sense out of this.
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188469#188469
i know, i read this before.
still i can't hear the six in any recording.
it can't be a coincidence that the location's name is gallery at number six.
they planned this carefully and with foresight.
the two you hear before the double 9 isn't as clear as the rest of numbers, I thought they just cut the first number (there is a little 'bump' before enumeration) and the 6th of the building would be indicative? no?
corwood wrote:drSoul91 wrote:corwood wrote:Magrathea wrote:corwood wrote:i am still not positive about hearing any 6 in the beginning of the code
not in the first recording and not in any other to be honest
the code is the NPR code but i hear a 2 in the beginning not a six at all.
gallery at number six is the name of last's night location
what if we received 299742 as the sixth number which is at position 1 as hinted?
just trying to make sense out of this.
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188469#188469
i know, i read this before.
still i can't hear the six in any recording.
it can't be a coincidence that the location's name is gallery at number six.
they planned this carefully and with foresight.
the two you hear before the double 9 isn't as clear as the rest of numbers, I thought they just cut the first number (there is a little 'bump' before enumeration) and the 6th of the building would be indicative? no?
this would make more sense to me, making it the npr code when combined.
i wish someone could go there right now and make a clear recording if the loop still plays at all.
worth checking out!
Elexen wrote:corwood wrote:drSoul91 wrote:corwood wrote:Magrathea wrote:corwood wrote:i am still not positive about hearing any 6 in the beginning of the code
not in the first recording and not in any other to be honest
the code is the NPR code but i hear a 2 in the beginning not a six at all.
gallery at number six is the name of last's night location
what if we received 299742 as the sixth number which is at position 1 as hinted?
just trying to make sense out of this.
http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188469#188469
i know, i read this before.
still i can't hear the six in any recording.
it can't be a coincidence that the location's name is gallery at number six.
they planned this carefully and with foresight.
the two you hear before the double 9 isn't as clear as the rest of numbers, I thought they just cut the first number (there is a little 'bump' before enumeration) and the 6th of the building would be indicative? no?
this would make more sense to me, making it the npr code when combined.
i wish someone could go there right now and make a clear recording if the loop still plays at all.
worth checking out!
That is one thought that passed thru my mind earlier. Either way, it's the NPR Code in the first slot.
And even if it's not and it's some other number, all of this thinking on one way or the other is fruitless. Everything will surely solidify and fall into place when the next clue is revealed. Then we will definitely know what goes where. Waiting for the next step is best at this point.
DudeMannerisms wrote:
I saw it as a comment on the "Everything You Do Is A Balloon" video.corwood wrote:DudeMannerisms wrote:
where does this come from?
DudeMannerisms wrote:I saw it as a comment on the "Everything You Do Is A Balloon" video.corwood wrote:DudeMannerisms wrote:
where does this come from?
ohsenova wrote:Guys, I think this person might have found out the location of the projected video:
http://imgur.com/a/onf37
Could this be a lead to the next clue? Does anyone live near there?
thepastinsidepressant wrote:ohsenova wrote:Guys, I think this person might have found out the location of the projected video:
http://imgur.com/a/onf37
Could this be a lead to the next clue? Does anyone live near there?
looks like it alright. if theres a clue found here great, but lets keep it all relevant eh brothers.
concepts are key not disjointed obscure nothingness.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests